Wednesday, November 19, 2008

A New Image: Cultivating Culture & Class in America


Public relations campaigns are everywhere and everyone seems to be a part of them. Whether for a political campaign, club opening or even a new product line, they seem to surround us and remain an integral part of the public relations world. While PR campaigns seem to play a vital role in the futures of politicians, celebrities and even Fortune 500 companies, maybe the one most in need of a PR campaign and image overhaul is a significant global power and world leader that we are all-too-familiar with. It may be considered a substantial undertaking and even unnecessary to some, but perhaps the “one” in need of a new image is our own country- the United States of America.

I had barely recovered from jet lag and only tasted a few bites of my first wiener schnitzel in Austria this summer before I was slapped in the face. No, I was not slapped by an angry Austrian man sporting lederhosen who suggested I drink more “house beer,” but rather by reality, and the reality was this: the Europeans were more consciously aware of the daily happenings on Wall Street or in the Senate than most Americans. They blew me away with more statistics, figures and opinions than I could ever imagine and wanted to discuss politics wherever we went. It did not matter if we were at a downtown café drinking cappuccinos or hiking in the Alps, they wanted to talk about our life, culture and political scene whenever I would allow it. While this knowledge and curiosity piqued my interest, I was left to answer some unsettling questions, but one stands out in my mind.

"Why are you bothering to learn a second language?  No one else in the United States does..."

That last question struck the wrong chord with me, especially after considering the fact that I was in Austria studying advanced German. However, it left me wondering: if the rest of the world regards us as dumb, lazy and wasteful Americans (as I was told by many Europeans), why don’t we do something as a country to change this general perception? While a public relations campaign focusing on America’s image might not be considered a high priority on Obama’s agenda with an economic crisis at hand, it might not be such a bad issue to tackle in the near future. What better way to erase the stereotypical image of overweight Americans driving Hummers to McDonald’s than by creating a public relations campaign focusing on educating Americans about literature, art, music and secondary languages?

While the White House is filled with many advisors scurrying about, telling the president what to say and how to maintain his image, perhaps the greatest advantage to any president is not the PR professional, but rather… the president’s spouse.

Let’s look back to the 1960s, a time when the United States was dealing with the Cuban missile crisis and nuclear policy causing rocky relations with France. Despite these troubles, one of President John F. Kennedy’s finest attributes was not his youth or charm, but rather his wife, Jacqueline Kennedy, who acted as a magnificent public relations asset.

President Kennedy was barely inaugurated on snow-covered Capitol Hill in January of 1961 when Jacqueline Kennedy began her White House “transformation” with a goal to make the White House a “showcase for great American art and artists.” Her plan for establishing culture and class in America came into full swing after an official presidential trip to Paris.

While JFK and French President Charles de Gaulle were at odds over the development of nuclear weapons, Jackie was wowing the people of France. Before their arrival, Jackie had the White House press secretary arrange an interview with French national television where she spoke in fluent French for 15 minutes over her love of the arts and Paris. This public relations endeavor proved successful, as Mr. and Mrs. Kennedy were greeted by a crowd of 500,000 Parisians, enthralled and captivated by the “first couple.” Jackie enraptured President de Gaulle, as well, as he later told JFK that she “knew more French history than most French women.”

If the PR world had a hall of fame, Jacqueline Kennedy’s next PR feat would be in it. After her Paris visit, not only did she continue to nurture the relationship between France and the U.S. as the First Lady, she began promoting art, literature and music in America by inviting France’s Minister of Cultural Affairs, André Malraux, to the White House.

Some may claim event planning is not part of the PR world, but Jackie was one woman who could successfully pull off a political agenda and throw a lavish affair flawlessly. Prior to Malraux’s visit, Jackie spent five weeks meticulously planning his visit. She met Malraux at the National Gallery of Art (also a great press photo opportunity) where she gave him her own personal tour and spoke of the international significance of great art.

Mrs. Kennedy united the cultural world that night. In Malraux’s honor, she planned an extravagant state dinner where America’s finest artists, writers and musicians were brought together. As described in Vanity Fair, “The gathering of the most accomplished men and women of the American cultural scene not only underscored Kennedys’ support of the arts, but also demonstrated how adept Jackie was at employing the arts in order to add prestige to Jack’s presidency.”

And the result of such a grand evening? Minister Malraux agreed to make arrangements to have Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece, Mona Lisa, brought to America which was the only time France had ever willingly agreed to let their beloved work visit another country.

The arrival of the Mona Lisa began to inspire America and made a lasting impression on Kennedy’s time in office. The masterpiece attracted millions of Americans, engaging and interesting them in art. As Arthur Schlesinger described, it was an exhilarating time in which “Washington engaged in a collective effort to make itself brighter, gayer, and more intellectual. The First Lady was at the center of this new feeling.”

Jackie touched the nation. She spoke superb French, enjoyed the arts, read masterpieces, entertained often and inspired women with her impeccable style and flair. Jacqueline Kennedy established the new American ideal. President Kennedy took his place on the international stage, but he did not do so alone like many presidents of the past. He made his mark on the world with Jackie at his side who acted not only as a wife, mother, and an art enthusiast, but as a diplomat, ambassador and First Lady.

Jacqueline Kennedy is still regarded as one of the greatest First Ladies of our time. And although she may not officially possess the title, she was an exquisite public relations practitioner who not only promoted art, literature, music and other cultures, but also established a new standard of living for the American way of life.

Reinstating this way of life and restoring America’s tarnished reputation should not be hard to accomplish, especially considering that our next First Lady, Michelle Obama, is regarded by some as the next Jacqueline Kennedy. This Princeton and Harvard Law grad is not only well-educated, but she also possesses an innate sense of style, similar to Jackie’s, and could be the chief proprietor in re-inventing America’s image.

Sources:

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Dear Santa...

I am making things easy this year, as there are only a couple of things that will make me happy...and I have been a pretty good girl this year, might I add.

1. Alabama beating LSU in Death Valley (mission accomplished.)

2. A National Championship title

3. A SEC Championship title

4. A man like Chuck Bass in my life (minus his cold heart at times). Bottom line: I love his wit, cocky ways, and impeccable style.

That's all. If you thought you could hit up the department stores and call it a day, you were mistaken. There are some things you just can't make in your North Pole workshop...

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

A Post-Game Rebuttal

I was born and raised wearing a deep red, but now at the age of 21, I wear the right red- the only red. A red that's good and gives life (I am not talking about blood, either). A red that complements houndstooth print blazers and colors a not-so-scarlet letter "A." That's right, I wear a deep red and it's seen in the color of my gameday hat, my cocktail dresses, and my lipstick---but this time it's not the Hoosier red of my childhood---it is the red that represents all things good and holy in our beloved Saban Nation---the color of the Crimson Tide.

So after many blogs over the role fashion is playing in our world today, I chose to address my other passion: Alabama football. I am doing this not because I want to bask in the fact that we are ranked No. 1 in the nation, going to the SEC Championship game in Atlanta, or because we silenced Death Valley with an overtime win this past weeked against LSU (okay, maybe just a little), I am doing it to silence the remarks of my family in the Midwest who lack the faith and excitement about a football program and school I have grown to love (and because I think it will make Thanksgiving talk rather interesting this year- man, if only Dustin was reading this...).

For all of you (you know who you are) who think that rankings mean everything and that the Alabama/LSU game should not have gone into overtime (I'm over that "Well, Bama was ranked No. 1...." crap), I think you are trying to forget one crucial point: the game was against LSU and it was in Death Valley. How would you feel to be a collegiate athlete (or coach) greeted not only by some of the most crazy, ill-mannered, and uncouth fans in the nation, but by a billboard advertising a Burn Bama party at a condominium development. I mean, who seriously burns a Nick Saban effigie to advertise real estate?! Only at LSU. While we are on the topic of destructive measures, what kind of fan shoots two Alabama fans after a game? Only an LSU fan. The madness continues.

LSU, if you haven't heard...Nick Saban did not leave you for us. He left you for the pro's. He just happened to be enticed by the opportunity that awaited him beyond the golden gates of Tuscaloosa (okay, maybe that's a stretch...). So quit your crying and go make some gumbo. I'm hungry.

As for you, all you Big 10 lovers, don't be jealous that the Crimson Tide can go into an extremely hostile environment in Baton Rouge, almost the equivalent of hell, and pull out a win with enough mistakes to lose three games. If rankings and an undefeated season mean everything like you say, go cheer on your beloved and nearby No. 14 undefeated Ball State (cough, cough, giggle). I'm not going to lie, though, it's probably going to be a nail-biter with those big games that lay ahead...you know how unruly things can get with Central Michigan... Their latest ESPN headline reads: Ball State takes down Miami of Ohio. Oh, wow....go get 'em Charlie Cardinal!

Aside from two more SEC games (including the Iron Bowl), let's look forward to the SEC Championship where I am sure you will be praying for a loss against the Gators to shut me up. And a good game it will be... if Tebow decides to come play and stops visiting prison inmates and saving orphans in third world countries for a minute. Oh, Tim Tebow-- Heisman winner and humanitarian. Puke.

Get ready for a good finish. You will wish that you had an Alabama shirt to wear. But don't worry, Hoosiers, basketball season will be around the corner soon enough and you will finally have a sport you can identify with, although sadly you might want to reconsider basketball as your sport of choice as the Indiana colleges' seasons don't look promising.

So game on, y'all. Bring your trash talk. Oh, and Tebow...call me.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

A Pleasant Surprise

Ok, so I will admit it. While I am frolicking around my kitchen every Monday night in my monogrammed Anthropologie apron and chopping up my father's home-grown organic garlic in preparation for a fantastic feast (naturally complemented with a glass of good wine), in reality I am prepping for "date night." Yes, at 8 o'clock every Monday, I prepare a feast fit for kings (although I usually enjoy it alone) and spend time admiring the love of my life (and fictional character) from afar, Chuck Bass, while over-analyzing the wardrobe selection during each new Gossip Girl episode.

To be perfectly honest, I never thought anything could get much better than Sex & the City. While most women love SATC for the Mr. Big/Carrie romance or getting the opportunity to drool over Smith Jared's perfectly chiseled body, I love it for everything that most people don't: the underlying, subliminal themes carried throughout the episodes and movie that unite the characters and make everything fantastically consistent. Like the fact that Carrie always wore some stand-out piece for a season (the gold pretzel necklace or the wrist corsage) and how the girls' style reflected their personalities in every way. If you haven't got it by now, I tend/love to over-analyze. I think that Michael Patrick King and Patricia Field are a magical duo, and their vision for the scenes of SATC was almost always perfect.

Needless to say, I have high standards, and was pleasantly surprised to see consistent, yet subliminal themes laced throughout Gossip Girl, as well. Besides the fact that it is extremely witty and fast-paced (my roommate still has trouble following the action which I find highly entertaining), the fashion is consistent (i.e. outrageous headbands found in every episode, neck ties for Blair Waldorf, etc.) and reflects the scenes, characters, and dialogue. And how could this be? Well, after a considerable amount of research (okay, maybe just a couple of minutes), I discovered the man behind the fashion, Eric Daman, who has also worked with (drum roll)...SATC's Pat Field. Fantastic.

So kudos to Eric Daman. You have been taught well and are doing an excellent job. With that, I have a couple closing comments:

Chuck Bass is looking exquisite this season and sharper than ever. Keep the suits, bow ties, vests, and comb-overs coming.

Jenny made a really drastic transition to rebellious teen last Monday ("Pret-a-Poor-J" episode) as carried out in wardrobe and make up. I am not far from my teen years and have never experienced an overnight metamorphosis like Jenny Humphrey's, so it was not exactly realistic, although production may be to blame for that. Regardless, your "Betsey Johnson meets Madonna of the 80s" look worked out well, but I think it was maybe too much, too soon.

If one of your 25 assistant stylists don't see your vision, I'll be your lady-in-waiting. I love what you're doing.

I will be looking for a new recipe for next Monday. Until next time, Gossip Girl lovers.

Dressed for Success

My grandmother, Nella Rose Taylor, told and taught me how to “dress for success” since the day I was born. A fabulous lesson, indeed, and probably also the reason I have a small obsession with excessively gaudy jewelry, silk scarves and Italian leather. She adorned my small fingers and wrists when I was only a toddler, sending me off to pre-school to play in the sandbox with a couple of carats on my fingers and a delicate gold, chain-linked bracelet to match (one that was later 
snatched off my wrist by my “caregiver” during nap time, might I add). And although her taste (and now mine) may be considered a little “over-the-top,” I treasure the lesson she taught me at a very young age and how she instilled in me the desire and need to dress for success everyday.

With the presidential election only days away, I have been
rather entertained in recent weeks by the role fashion is playing in the political scene. From the hot debate over Sarah Palin’s $150,000 wardrobe to discussions over Cindy McCain’s possible $300,000 get-up for the Republican National Convention, our eyes and ears seem to be focused upon what the ladies of the political scene are wearing and less on the more pressing issues.

Michelle Obama seems to be “winning the race” with the American people because of her economical approach to dressing. Having made Vanity Fair’s International Best-Dressed List and thought of by some as the next Jacqueline Kennedy, Michelle Obama is praised for her classic, chic style with streamlined silhouettes and gumball-sized faux pearls. She can be spotted sporting everything from White House Black Market to H&M as she strives to connect with the everyday woman/wife/mother on the go. She also isn't afraid to mention, in a nonchalant manner, that she just happens to be wearing an affordable J. Crew ensemble when asked about Sarah Palin’s sizeable wardrobe allowance on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno.”

While I certainly do love Michelle Obama and respect her style choices, I feel that Cindy McCain stands a notch above the other ladies in the style department, and not just because her closet is filled with pricier designer goods. She is not afraid to make a bold statement, and her pieces are always fashion-forward, despite the times she may "push the envelope" to some.

I thought she looked very polished and exquisite at the Republican National Convention when she wowed the crowd with her bright, buttercup-yellow high-collared Oscar de la Renta dress. I certainly found it more aesthetically-pleasing than the white, drab suit that First Lady Laura Bush chose.  Despite her radiance, she was named as the woman with the $300,000 outfit.  The worst thing? Both McCain and Bush were sporting Oscar de la Renta pieces, at nearly the same price, but the criticism that Cindy McCain received comes into play because of her choice of accessories. For some reason, it is suddenly acceptable to wear Oscar de la Renta (as opposed to the pieces from Target that Michelle Obama supposedly wears), but when pairing a piece with perhaps a Chanel watch or her classic four-strand pearl necklace (that she is pictured in and wears quite often), one is suddenly deemed over-the-top? Unfair! 

How is Michelle Obama praised for her personal style, "affordable and fresh," and still named the next Jacqueline Kennedy? Have we suddenly forgotten that Jackie O. was not just chic and simple, or must I remind you of something such as the Hubert de Givenchy evening gown, embroidered with silk floss and bejeweled with seed pearls, that she wore to a dinner at the Palace of Versailles in 1961?  Must I remind you that most of Jacqueline Kennedy's wardrobe was designed specifically for her by Oleg Cassini?  Michelle Obama's wardrobe is no comparison to the custom-made and expensive pieces that filled Mrs. Kennedy's closet.  In fact, it was Mrs. Kennedy who wrote a friend in August of 1960 stating that she "must start to buy American clothes and have it known where she buys them from because of the controversies over her inclination to famous French fashion houses."  

Talk of politics and fashion can not go without mention of vice presidential candidate, Sarah Palin. And where to begin, as she must always be criticized for something. I will admit, her maverick comments and “don’t ya know” throw-ins are rather irritating, but it would be nice if the media could focus upon her stance on issues or her qualifications as vice president more than her wardrobe allowance. 

                                                           Ok, so she had a field day in Saks and Nieman
Marcus with a $150,000. So what? Yes, I realize that the money could be invested/donated/used elsewhere, but the bottom line is: if you were given $150K for campaign attire, don’t tell me you wouldn’t go shopping and have a little fun. Palin is criticized for her spending spree, but she would have been criticized more if she would have jumped on the campaign trail with all of her over-sized turtlenecks and fleeces from her Alaska days.  Criticism seems inevitable.  We should be happy that she is now representing our country with a little more class and style instead of looking like a woman that the ice hockey team ravaged on the way home from practice while carpooling.

The talk, hype and criticism will continue, but regardless of which party makes their way into the White House, it is refreshing to know that we will be continually greeted with trendy images and no longer slapped in the face with the brightly-colored pantsuits of Hillary Clinton or the dowdy frocks of Laura Bush.  And although no one knows the future of the next presidential term, we can count on one thing:  Michelle Obama, Cindy McCain and Sarah Palin will be dressing for success in the days to come.

Monday, October 27, 2008

Couture, Catwalks, Controversy & Counterfeits

In the world of public relations and fashion, image seems to be everything. Your reputation, who you know, and in some cases, what you’re wearing can make or break you. The all-important question seems to be: how important is image? In the world of fashion PR, designers, companies and customers are going to great lengths to not only enhance their image, but in some cases, to protect it, too.

In recent years, the desire for designer goods has reached epic proportions as consumers are constantly trying to re-create the latest runway looks. It certainly does not help that images of celebrities sporting these designer frocks surround us wherever we go. One can not hide from Hollywood stars, such as Cameron Diaz, gracing the covers and pages US magazine wearing those oh-so classic skinny jeans, but don’t forget the moss patent leather Gucci clutch in hand that retails for only $1,050. So what should one do when they crave the hottest fall trends straight from the fashion houses of Paris, the same looks they can not afford?

It’s quite easy, as consumers only have three options: find a realistic knockoff, go to a mass-market retailer that has teamed up with a world-renowned designer for low-cost looks (i.e. Vera Wang for Kohl’s), or refuse to pay rent for a few months all so you can rock the newest $945 Manolo Blahnik “Something Blue” satin pumps. Regardless of which option you choose, the current craze for haute couture has turned into a public relations nightmare for practitioners in the fashion world and it does not seem as if they will be waking up from this bad dream anytime soon.

As many shoppers crave clothes and accessories that are only in the price range of the wealthy and elite, they are finding alternatives that look the same, but are in no way made of authentic Italian leather or actual crocodile like the creations of top designers. Enter the counterfeiting industry. No one knows for sure, but the World Customs Organization estimates that the trade in counterfeit goods is valued at over $500 billion. Knockoffs resembling the creations from European fashion houses, such as those in Milan, are constantly in demand, and although Italy only contributes to 1.4 percent of the counterfeiting industry, the Italian Institute Against Counterfeit Goodsestimates that Italy has lost more than 40,000 jobs in the past decade because of lost sales attributed to replica goods.

So aside from writing news releases and planning fashion week, public relations practitioners are now left with the daunting task of trying to fight crime and defend brand image for designer clients, as well.

Because many people are unaware of the disturbing effects associated with the counterfeiting industry, Harper’s Bazaar, the world renowned fashion magazine, has developed a public relations campaign to create awareness about the illegal activities associated with imitation designer goods by establishing the Harper’s Bazaar Anticounterfeiting Alliance. Its “Fakes Are Never in Fashion” campaign educates shoppers on the negative aspects associated with counterfeiting industry and teaches buyers how to determine fakes versus authentic luxury goods.

The French holding company Moët Hennessy – Louis Vuitton (LVMH), the world’s largest luxury goods conglomerate, has also stepped up to combat counterfeiters head-on. As stated on the LVMH web site, the counterfeiting industry “unlawfully takes advantage of the prestige of its (luxury) brands and harms their tradition, identity and image.” In June, LVMH took legal action against eBay, a web site known for selling replica goods, resulting in a Paris court order requiring eBay to pay approximately $26 million in damages to Louis Vuitton and $30 million to Christian Dior.

This may be considered only a small victory for LVMH, as Louis Vuitton spends millions of dollars annually on a zero tolerance policy against counterfeiting. In 2004 alone, Louis Vuitton’s actions resulted in 947 arrests, more than 6,000 raids, over 13,000 legal actions, and the seizure of many fake printing cylinders.

Not only has this been an ongoing PR fiasco for LVMH, this ruling puteBay’s PR department into over-drive, too. According to Nichola Sharpe, the US spokesperson at eBay, she said the company developed a global crisis communication plan months in advance and worked with global PR teams to prepare for the ruling.

In the fashion war to combat counterfeiting, one might consider buying low-cost goods created by top designers at mass retail chains a solution. Think again. It may appear to be the perfect world, one where shoppers can have access to the affordable designs of Karl Lagerfeld and Isaac Mizrahi at places such as H&M and Target. Wrong. While many are praising top designers’ inexpensive creations, many of the “fashion elite” consider this a fashion faux pas.

“I think when the designers continue to have collections at the lower-priced line, it can be a detriment,” Heather White of W magazine said. “Honestly, Isaac Mizrahi…would you pay $10,000 for a couture multicolored knit sweater? Not after you associate him with producing clothes at Target.”

White is a prime example of those who believe that the overexposure of designers’ creations at mass retail chains could tarnish a luxurious brand’s image and identity. Why would one want to spend over $2,800 for a Stella McCartney dress at Nieman Marcus when people actually have the option of purchasing her clothes at (gasp!) H&M?! The nightmare continues.

So if fighting the counterfeiting industry is almost comparable to declaring war on a small country, and if large retail chains can tarnish a name and image, what is the solution? Perhaps the solution lies in educating the world about the counterfeiting industry. Maybe people would reconsider visiting Canal Street in Manhattan for a knockoff handbag if they knew that these same counterfeiting rackets also deal with narcotics, weapons and child prostitution. I bet my boyfriend’s mom would have taken that into consideration before she bought me the little replica Chanel diamond earrings as a stocking stuffer this past Christmas. Sadly, no one ever mentioned to her that the sale of counterfeit goods has also helped support a Shiite terrorist group. I know I took that into consideration as I was chased down the alleyways of Venice this summer, refusing to let vendors sell me poorly made “Prada” bags.

So instead of investing millions of dollars into combating counterfeiters directly, perhaps PR practitioners should focus their campaigns upon educating their prime target audience: shoppers. Instead of spending time debating whether or not Mossimo Giannulli ruined his career by designing for Target, people should be spreading the world about the negative aspects associated with counterfeiting. The reality is this: everyone knows that knockoffs exist, but many people don’t know the disturbing details associated with the industry.

For the time being, we can only hope that more PR practices begin anti-counterfeiting educational campaigns like that of Harper’s Bazaar and in the meantime, I will personally enjoy wearing my Isaac Mizrahi dress from the Target collection and only wishing that I had $495 for the Giuseppe Zanotti leopard-print ballerina flats to match. I’ll keep wishing and watching as this fashion PR nightmare continues to unfold.

Other Sources: